The Concept of Principles of Natural Justice

Principles of Natural Justice refer to fundamental legal principles that ensure fairness in legal proceedings and decision-making processes. These principles are rooted in ensuring that decisions are made in a just and unbiased manner.

Following are the Key Principals :

1. Audi Alteram Partem (Right to Be Heard) Explanation: This principle ensures that both parties involved in a case have the opportunity to present their side before any decision is made. Affected persons must be informed of the allegations against them and given a chance to defend themselves.

2. Nemo Judex in Causa Sua (Rule Against Bias) Explanation: This principle requires the decision- maker to be impartial and free from any personal interest in the outcome of the case.

3. Notice Explanation: Adequate notice of the charges, hearing dates, and the consequences must be given to the person concerned. It allows them to prepare for the hearing.

4. Reasoned Decision Explanation: The authority must provide a clear, reasoned decision. A mere pronouncement without explaining the rationale is insufficient. The decision must mention the key issues, findings, and reasoning.

5. Right to Present Evidence Explanation: The person affected should be allowed to present evidence in their defense. This includes both documentary and oral evidence.

6. Cross-Examination Explanation: The affected party must have the opportunity to cross-examine witnesses or challenge the evidence presented against them.

7. Decision Based on Evidence Explanation: Decisions must be based on relevant evidence presented during the hearing. Authorities cannot rely on assumptions, extraneous materials, or personal knowledge to make their decision.

8. Rule of Fairness Explanation: Fairness is the overarching principle governing natural justice. Even if all procedural aspects are followed, if the overall process is not fair, the decision can be challenged.

9. Right to Appeal Explanation: A person affected by a decision should have the right to challenge it before a higher or appellate authority. This right ensures that any errors or biases in the initial decision can be rectified.

10. Institutional Bias Explanation: The decision-making body must not have any institutional interest in the outcome of the proceedings. If the institution itself stands to gain from the outcome, it cannot be an impartial decision-maker.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to build a trans-inclusive workplace?

Image
Introduction In public spaces, especially the workplace, transgender people frequently encounter stigma and discrimination. They often face hostility from others and are pressured to ‘manage’ their gender identities. Such events can trigger a wide range of psychological reactions that can have disastrous effects on a transgender person’s emotional health, level of job satisfaction, and probability to remain with a company. Therefore, it is significant that employers and companies build trans-inclusive workplaces for their transgender employees. The primary reason for addressing this issue is that it is morally appropriate to do so. Every person who is contributing to the success of the company should never have to fear going to work every day. Businesses can lose a lot by not implementing trans-specific policies and procedures, such as through a decrease in turnover, less participation and productivity, and even legal action. The company’s reputation is harmed by discriminatory behavio...
Read more

Sexual abuse at work

Image
POSHADVO has been founded to help keep workplaces free of sexual abuse across all sectors in the country. Sexual abuse at work POSHADVO firmly believes, as an organization, that sexual harassment is a serious denial of the right to equality, dignity and respect.  Sexual abuse at work  is something that most people routinely witness, but many do not openly speak about. Typically, this is for fear of losing their job, facing society's scorn, being caught up in never-ending court action or for other unspecified reasons. Gender equality in all dimensions is a basic human right and the Constitution of India (“Constitution”) guarantees all its citizens equality of status and opportunity. Sexual harassment is considered as a violation of a woman’s fundamental right to equality, which right is guaranteed by Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution. The Constitution also provides every citizen the ‘right to practice or carry out any occupation, trade or business, which includes the right...
Read more

Who is an external member for PoSH?

Image
Introduction Workplace sexual harassment results from power dynamics between the accused and the victim. Power dynamics exist at every level of the organization. The same applies to the PoSH Committee constituted under the PoSH Act, 2013. This committee is the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) or the Internal Committee (IC). Power dynamics can often creep into case investigations by the ICC. Thus, it requires the nomination of an external member for PoSH. The external member for PoSH acts as a neutral third party that keeps the bias of the ICC in check. Both the PoSH Act and Rules lay down certain guidelines for the nomination of an external member. Yet, the external member’s duties, roles, and responsibilities remain unclear. But the judiciary has determined the role of the external member for PoSH. Book Appointment -  Best Posh Law Firm in India Provision for an external member for PoSH As per Section 4 of the PoSH Act: A senior female employee should head the PoSH Committee, A...
Read more