Saurabh Kumar Mallick v. CAG: Reinforcing the Reach of the POSH Act in Government Institutions

In a landmark judgment, the Delhi High Court delivered a resounding verdict that extended the applicability of the Prevention of Sexual Harassment (POSH) Act to government organizations, including constitutional bodies like the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG). The case of Saurabh Kumar Mallick v. Comptroller & Auditor General of India (2018) was a pivotal moment in ensuring that the principles of the POSH Act are upheld across all spheres of employment, irrespective of the nature or status of the organization.

The Crux of the Case

The case arose from a petition filed by Saurabh Kumar Mallick, an Assistant Audit Officer employed with the CAG, who alleged that he had been subjected to sexual harassment by a superior officer. Mallick claimed that despite filing a formal complaint, the CAG failed to take appropriate action or constitute an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) as mandated by the POSH Act.

The CAG, in its defense, argued that as a constitutional body, it was not bound by the provisions of the POSH Act, which primarily applied to private-sector organizations and government departments.

The Decisive Ruling

The Delhi High Court, in its judgment, unequivocally rejected the CAG's contention and affirmed the applicability of the POSH Act to all organizations, including constitutional bodies like the CAG. The court's reasoning was based on a comprehensive analysis of the Act's provisions and its overarching objective of providing a safe and secure work environment for all employees, regardless of the organization's nature or status.

Key Observations and Implications:

Broad Applicability: The High Court emphasized that the POSH Act is a comprehensive legislation aimed at addressing sexual harassment in all workplaces, without any exceptions or limitations based on the type of organization.

Constitutional Mandate: The court highlighted that the POSH Act is a manifestation of India's constitutional commitment to ensuring gender equality and the right to life and dignity for all individuals, including those employed in constitutional bodies.

Equal Protection: The judgment reinforced the principle that all employees, irrespective of their place of employment, are entitled to equal protection under the law and the right to a safe and secure work environment.

Compliance Obligations: The court underscored that constitutional bodies like the CAG are not exempt from their obligations under the POSH Act, including the requirement to constitute an Internal Complaints Committee and implement mechanisms for addressing sexual harassment complaints.

The Broader Impact

The Saurabh Kumar Mallick v. CAG judgment has far-reaching implications for the effective implementation of the POSH Act across various sectors and organizations. It sends a clear message that no institution, regardless of its constitutional status or nature, can claim exemption from the provisions of this crucial legislation.

By extending the reach of the POSH Act to government organizations and constitutional bodies, the Delhi High Court has reinforced the principles of equality, non-discrimination, and the right to a safe and dignified work environment for all employees. This judgment serves as a powerful reminder that the fight against sexual harassment in the workplace transcends organizational boundaries and requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders, including those in positions of authority and responsibility.

As India continues to grapple with the pervasive issue of sexual harassment, this landmark ruling reinforces the commitment to creating inclusive and equitable workplaces, where every individual can thrive and contribute to the nation's progress without fear of harassment or discrimination

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to build a trans-inclusive workplace?

Image
Introduction In public spaces, especially the workplace, transgender people frequently encounter stigma and discrimination. They often face hostility from others and are pressured to ‘manage’ their gender identities. Such events can trigger a wide range of psychological reactions that can have disastrous effects on a transgender person’s emotional health, level of job satisfaction, and probability to remain with a company. Therefore, it is significant that employers and companies build trans-inclusive workplaces for their transgender employees. The primary reason for addressing this issue is that it is morally appropriate to do so. Every person who is contributing to the success of the company should never have to fear going to work every day. Businesses can lose a lot by not implementing trans-specific policies and procedures, such as through a decrease in turnover, less participation and productivity, and even legal action. The company’s reputation is harmed by discriminatory behavio
Read more

Sexual abuse at work

Image
POSHADVO has been founded to help keep workplaces free of sexual abuse across all sectors in the country. Sexual abuse at work POSHADVO firmly believes, as an organization, that sexual harassment is a serious denial of the right to equality, dignity and respect.  Sexual abuse at work  is something that most people routinely witness, but many do not openly speak about. Typically, this is for fear of losing their job, facing society's scorn, being caught up in never-ending court action or for other unspecified reasons. Gender equality in all dimensions is a basic human right and the Constitution of India (“Constitution”) guarantees all its citizens equality of status and opportunity. Sexual harassment is considered as a violation of a woman’s fundamental right to equality, which right is guaranteed by Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution. The Constitution also provides every citizen the ‘right to practice or carry out any occupation, trade or business, which includes the right to a
Read more

Who is an external member for PoSH?

Image
Introduction Workplace sexual harassment results from power dynamics between the accused and the victim. Power dynamics exist at every level of the organization. The same applies to the PoSH Committee constituted under the PoSH Act, 2013. This committee is the Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) or the Internal Committee (IC). Power dynamics can often creep into case investigations by the ICC. Thus, it requires the nomination of an external member for PoSH. The external member for PoSH acts as a neutral third party that keeps the bias of the ICC in check. Both the PoSH Act and Rules lay down certain guidelines for the nomination of an external member. Yet, the external member’s duties, roles, and responsibilities remain unclear. But the judiciary has determined the role of the external member for PoSH. Book Appointment -  Best Posh Law Firm in India Provision for an external member for PoSH As per Section 4 of the PoSH Act: A senior female employee should head the PoSH Committee, At le
Read more